Toward Old Leadership
Posted by Daniel in Daniel Pryfogle, Leadership on July 28th, 2008What do you call it when a leader notices possibilities and not just problems? What name do you give to a leader who sees resources in a bleak situation, notices the seeds of peace amid conflict, or observes movement in a place that appears stuck? What would you call this capacity to frame any situation in a positive way — not a Polly-Annish framing, as if to ignore the problems, the challenges, those harsh realities, but a way that recognizes and acts upon more reality, our individual and collective ability?
My questions are somewhat rhetorical. Today I am not looking for another word. I’m sure we are not lacking in adjectives to stick in front of leader, as in “servant leader,” or “visionary leader,” or “authentic leader.” The bookshelves are full of such titles. What I am puzzling over is why the kind of leadership I contemplate above is so rare as to not be easily understood.
How did leadership become something other than the capacity to call forth what’s already present? Humanity has known for ages that the good teacher, the good parent, the good artist and the good farmer were the ones who could see and summon gifts already present. We have known that the work of leaders is to name, interpret, raise to consciousness, make explicit, cultivate, leverage what already is, what’s waiting in some instances, what’s hidden even, but what already is. Somewhere along the way, however, leadership became a task of producing what’s absent. And it became a technique of getting people to do what they are not inclined to do. Leadership became management: a bag of tricks to make up for what’s missing and to motivate people who’d rather be doing something else.
What would it take to reacquaint ourselves with that older understanding of leadership? Read the rest of this entry »
